Me too - settled science is an oxymoron! The story that you'll see emerging is that real world observations do not support the theory of man-made climate change, which is enshrined in complex computer simulations that do not perform that well. There are several reasons for this including corruption of the surface temperature record (the Earth is not warming as fast as is claimed), reliance on unsupported assumptions (especially delays in transfer of thermal energy from oceans to land), failure to acknowledge saturation effects for CO2 (there's only so much energy it can transfer), failure to acknowledge the modulation of the climate by clouds (and the role cosmic rays play in this) and failure to account for significant variations in solar energy transfer through particle forcing. These are just a few examples of a list as long as your arm!
Over a bunch of newsletters I hope to show that natural variability, certain long-term cycles in various processes and changes in total solar energy input explain precisely what we are witnessing - and that's without addressing the incredible amount of scientific fraud that is being perpetrated! Careers and cash have replaced integrity.
An analogy is a child playing on a see-saw who thinks that they are going to keep going up because that's what happened in the first second. Then someone comes along and blames the going up on them farting, and so the supervisor decides on a net zero policy for baked beans. The child on the other end of the see-saw is the sun. The supervisor claims the sun is not capable of moving anything because they've measured movement of their feet and they're not moving! What they haven't done is measure the movement of the sun's arse and they are not going to do that anytime soon otherwise it's game over.
I hadn’t seen Svensmark’s movie but I did read his book about six years back. Now if we are looking for big time climate change drivers, you might find Paul A LaViolette’s “Evidence for a Global Warming at the Termination I Boundary and Its Possible Cosmic Dust Cause” (0503158.pdf) is even more mind blowing. It’s hard to believe such iconoclastic empirical evidence researchers get so little attention. On the subject of Global Energy Budget, I assume you have found the GEBA database https://geba.ethz.ch/ ETH Zurich. Martin Wild published a free paper on the veracity and extent of the data. I’m still struggling to find more about the UK stations.
Thank you for all your hard work!! I'm starting to understand more, slowly but surely. Are there definitive conclusions coming down the road?
Me too - settled science is an oxymoron! The story that you'll see emerging is that real world observations do not support the theory of man-made climate change, which is enshrined in complex computer simulations that do not perform that well. There are several reasons for this including corruption of the surface temperature record (the Earth is not warming as fast as is claimed), reliance on unsupported assumptions (especially delays in transfer of thermal energy from oceans to land), failure to acknowledge saturation effects for CO2 (there's only so much energy it can transfer), failure to acknowledge the modulation of the climate by clouds (and the role cosmic rays play in this) and failure to account for significant variations in solar energy transfer through particle forcing. These are just a few examples of a list as long as your arm!
Over a bunch of newsletters I hope to show that natural variability, certain long-term cycles in various processes and changes in total solar energy input explain precisely what we are witnessing - and that's without addressing the incredible amount of scientific fraud that is being perpetrated! Careers and cash have replaced integrity.
An analogy is a child playing on a see-saw who thinks that they are going to keep going up because that's what happened in the first second. Then someone comes along and blames the going up on them farting, and so the supervisor decides on a net zero policy for baked beans. The child on the other end of the see-saw is the sun. The supervisor claims the sun is not capable of moving anything because they've measured movement of their feet and they're not moving! What they haven't done is measure the movement of the sun's arse and they are not going to do that anytime soon otherwise it's game over.
I'll second that, JD.
I hadn’t seen Svensmark’s movie but I did read his book about six years back. Now if we are looking for big time climate change drivers, you might find Paul A LaViolette’s “Evidence for a Global Warming at the Termination I Boundary and Its Possible Cosmic Dust Cause” (0503158.pdf) is even more mind blowing. It’s hard to believe such iconoclastic empirical evidence researchers get so little attention. On the subject of Global Energy Budget, I assume you have found the GEBA database https://geba.ethz.ch/ ETH Zurich. Martin Wild published a free paper on the veracity and extent of the data. I’m still struggling to find more about the UK stations.
Ooooo - tasty! I better get a brew going and take a look at that. It's criminal just how much good science has been suppressed in support of net zero.